Sep 17, 2025
𝄪
3 min to read
Why Your Snowflake Bill Is So High (And How to Cut It by 40%)
Learn why Snowflake bills skyrocket in mid-size firms and how CFOs can cut costs by 40% without killing adoption or migrating platforms.
Ali Z.
𝄪
CEO @ aztela
Why Your Snowflake Bill Keeps Climbing
Mid-size companies are waking up to $250k+ Snowflake bills every year.
The CFO panics. The data team scrambles:
Tune queries
Resize clusters
Hunt down expensive jobs
Standardize logic
But here’s the truth: technical patches don’t solve cost problems.
Most of your bill isn’t queries or clusters.
It’s dashboards nobody opens, pipelines nobody trusts, and terabytes of “just-in-case” data you’ll never use.
The Real Problem: Strategy, Not Technology
Snowflake isn’t the problem.
Your lack of clarity and governance is.
Here’s what your invoice is actually paying for:
Millions to store and process data nobody uses.
Terabytes of “just-in-case” data hoarded for years.
Three teams building redundant pipelines to answer the same question.
Analysts running slow queries on messy, duplicated data.
CFOs think they bought “advanced analytics.”
What they got was a $250k support desk and metrics nobody trusts.
👉 Related reading: Why BI projects fail
How Much Should Snowflake Really Cost?
For most mid-market firms (200–500 FTE), Snowflake spend should track closely with business adoption:
Company Size | Typical Data Volume | Healthy Snowflake Spend |
|---|---|---|
200 FTE | 5–10 TB | $100k–$150k / year |
500 FTE | 15–25 TB | $200k–$300k / year |
1000 FTE | 30–50 TB | $400k–$500k / year |
If your spend is 2–3x above these ranges, you don’t have a data scale problem. You have a governance and adoption problem.
Playbook: Cut Snowflake Costs by 40% Without Killing Adoption
1. Stop Paying for Useless Data
Ask one blunt question for every dataset:
“What P&L decision does this drive?”
If no clear answer → cut it.
Eliminate $5k/month commercial datasets nobody touches.
Require a product brief for every new dataset → what outcome it supports.
2. Build a Single Source of Truth
Unify business definitions across departments.
End revenue debates between Finance and Sales.
Assign every metric an owner.
This prevents the “three redundant pipelines” problem that inflates costs.
3. Tie Every Dollar to an Outcome
No more vanity dashboards.
No funding for “quick pulls.”
Every project = clear, measurable business impact.
4. Enforce Strategy & Governance
Quarterly reviews: what’s used, what isn’t, what gets cut.
Every metric, dashboard, pipeline = assigned owner + business case.
Kill shadow IT before it hits the invoice.
👉 Related reading: How to tie data projects to ROI
Checklist: Snowflake Cost Optimization
Do This | Don’t Do This |
|---|---|
Tie data to business outcomes | Store “just-in-case” data for years |
Assign metric ownership | Let teams define revenue 3 different ways |
Review usage quarterly | Fund vanity dashboards nobody opens |
Cut unused datasets fast | Assume query tuning alone will save you |
The Bottom Line
Snowflake isn’t expensive.
Waste is expensive.
If your bill feels out of control:
Stop paying for data nobody uses.
Build a single source of truth.
Tie every dollar to business outcomes.
That’s how mid-market firms cut Snowflake costs by 40% in 90 days — without killing adoption.
👉 Next: The 90-Day BI Adoption Playbook
Content
FOOTNOTE
Not AI-generated but from experience of working with +30 organizations deploying data & AI production-ready solutions.
